Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 01:33

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
NYC summer stargazing seasons kicks off with triangle, meteor showers - Gothamist
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
"Gasping": Scientists Make Breakthrough Toward Full Cure for HIV - futurism.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
‘Gas station heroin’ is technically illegal and widely available. Here are the facts - AP News
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How do organic ready-to-eat meals compare to conventional ones?
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Roberts: Chance Of Ohtani Pitching Before All-Star Break Is "North Of Zero" - MLB Trade Rumors
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.